Archive for October, 2006

A Short Biography on Some of Europe’s Most Loved and Hated Monarchs - Pt2 (Mad) King George III

Tuesday, October 31st, 2006

King George III who suffered from porphyria, a maddening disease, was born in 1738 to Frederick, Prince of Wales and Augusta. In 1761 George married Charlotte of Mecklinburg-Strelitz and together produced fifteen children: nine sons and six daughters.

King George III came to the throne in 1760 and was determined to recover the power lost to the ministerial council by the first two Georges by systematically weakening the Whig party through bribery, coercion and patronage. Prime Minister, William Pitt the Elder was toppled by Whigs in 1763 after the signing of the Peace of Paris, and men of ordinary aptitude were then hand-picked by George as Cabinet members to become little more than yes-men. Bouts with madness and the handling of the American Revolution eroded his support and the power of the Crown was granted again to the Prime Minister.

In 1763 The Peace of Paris brought an end to the Seven Years’ War with France and Great Britain emerged from the conflict as the world’s greatest colonial power. England thrived but King George III’s ongoing commitment to taxing the American colonies to pay for military protection led to conflict in 1775. The colonists declared their independence from England in 1776, but George stubbornly continued with the war until the final American victory at Yorktown in 1781. The signing of The Peace of Versailles in 1783 ensured British recognition of the United States of America. The stress of these events took their toll on George: his sanity was stretched to the breaking point and his political power decreased when William Pitt the Younger became Prime Minister in 1783. George clawed back some of his powers, driving Pitt from office during the years 1801 to 1804, but his condition worsened and he ceased to rule in 1811.

Ten years after the ending of war with France, England joined a continental coalition against French revolutionary forces who sought total French supremacy throughout Europe. By 1797, most of Europe was under French control, with England going at it alone against the oppressive French Republic. The British Navy again proved its worth by defeating French forces at Camperdown, Cape St. Vincent and the Battle of the Nile in 1797, and finally at Copenhagen in 1801. France sued for peace in 1802.

Napoleon Bonaparte came to power and in 1803 renewed attacks against England, which lasted until 1814. Arthur Wellesley, Duke of Wellington, led the army whilst Lord Horatio Nelson, who won the decisive battle off Cape Trafalgar, commanded the British navy. In addition to the war with France, England was also at war again with the United States during the period 1812-14, over the British practice of conscripting American seamen into service in the British Navy.

In 1814, both wars came to an end; Napoleon was defeated and England agreed not to press into service anymore-American sailors.

George’s madness ultimately left the fate of the crown in the hands of his eldest son George, Prince Regent. Prince George was put in the unenviable position of attempting to govern according to the increasingly erratic behaviour of his father.

King George III died blind, deaf and mad at Windsor Castle on January 29, 1820.

I hope you have enjoyed reading about King George III.

In my next article will learn about the life of King Ludwig II
Unitl then,

Best wishes and have a great day

Stuart Bazga

guide-to-castles-of-europe.com/index.html Guide to Castles of Europe

guide-to-castles-of-europe.com/index.html A Guide to Castles of Europe was born from childhood dreams and aspirations. It is my hope to educate and stimulate you into exploring these castles for yourselves.

No Fun Na

Tuesday, October 31st, 2006

Not so long ago I wrote about the Da Vinci Code causing a big stink here in India. That bubble has just about burst and lo behold we have another film causing a stir. The film Fanaa (Destruction) has got the BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party) in Gujarat in a twist. Well it’s not exactly a problem with the film but with its main actor Aamir Khan.

You see Aamir Khan has recently had a stint at being a social activist. He made the mistake of speaking his mind in the world’s largest democracy. It all began with people protesting against raising the height of the Narmada Dam which we in India supposedly need to meet our insatiable demand for energy particularly in this case – electricity. The protestors are demanding proper rehabilitation for the thousands of people that have been displaced because of this mammoth project. Aamir Khan joined in to give their demands a louder voice. That did it.

The right wing ruling Hindu party in Gujarat the BJP has banned all products endorsed by the actor including Coca Cola and Toyota cars and also his latest film release Fanaa. This does not in anyway represent the will of the general public in the state nor does it make much sense. The movie was released a few days ago in the rest of the country and has got a good response.

When will our political parties realize that the people no longer get excited about these frenzied agitations, which lack any real depth and are done just for show. The losers in this case are only the people of Gujarat. They need to realize that speaking one’s mind on any issue facing the people of India is the fundamental right of every citizen of the country. We cannot censure people in society just because we don’t like what they say.

Fanaa is about the relationship between a blind girl and an undercover terrorist. It has nothing against the state or people of Gujarat. Why then should it be banned? It is mainstream cinema that will do well or not on its own strengths as a film. This entire furor is hype generated by two bit politicians mainly for their fifteen minutes of fame.

For all those hot heads seeking a ban on an actor or any person for that matter, who uses his or her freedom of speech, may we remind them that maybe they are living in the wrong part of the world here. I would suggest a mass migration to a much cooler locale, for instance North Korea.

Sasha Masand the founder of indian-voice-overs.com/ Indian Voice Overs is an award winning Television Producer who has been part of the Indian media industry for over twelve years.

Conversation Time Saver

Tuesday, October 31st, 2006

Ever wish you could make money off of people’s seemingly burning desire to give themselves hearing damage? If you can either

a) Hear Iron Maiden from 9 rows ahead of you on the Bus.
b) Feel the chassis of your car/truck/scooter rattling when someone pulls up in an Acura with the bass turned up louder than Armageddon.

OR

c) Picture someone boring a drill bit into their eardrum

Then you know you have a target audience!

What does this have to do with saving time and making money, you ask? Well, nothing to do with money, really. But time, yes. For you see, something happens when we age. Like it or not, the membrane of the inner ear becomes more rigid and the hair cells, less flexible. This leads to diminished hearing. This phenomena, combined with the natural desire of fame and fortune that can only be had through hearing damage, leads to an individual with very poor hearing.

With this information armed and in hand, set off to your nearest retirement home and witness the startling practical application of this knowledge: Some old people cannot hear very well.

But what, you ask. What does this all mean? Allow me to demonstrate in scenario form, everyone’s favorite:

Meanwhile, at the retirement house:

Kelly: (with slightly elevated tone) “Hey, mom, did you hear that blue ink has now passed black ink in terms of popularity in men aged 22-25?”

Mom: “What’s that, dear?”

This important, “What’s that, dear?” forces Kelly to reevaluate what she has said, and deems it either
a) Too unimportant to bother repeating
b) Too pointless and irrelevant to bother repeating
c) A wake up call for how stupid Kelly really is

This has an extremely important implication to real life:

When someone says something, don′t listen the first time. Then rudely reply, “What?” If they begin to repeat themselves, then you can pretty safely assume that what they are saying is mildly important or relevant. If not, you saved yourself the space in your brain to process what the person has said!

You can thank me now,
Your neurons will thank me later.

For other such nonsense, check out:

queensdecree.com queensdecree.com

Living With Your Aries Child

Tuesday, October 31st, 2006

The Aries child is a “doer”. Aries Children have natural enthusiasm and will spur everyone else along. The energy is boundless. This daredevil will want to live and experience everything. There will also be a strong competitive instinct along with a great stamina. This kid will never consider coming second - the “winners” podium is theirs.

Aries will be impatient and will tend to start many projects losing interest long before completion. Frustration is a super-quick instinct with these children - frustration with their own abilities, and frustration in the inability or lack of pace of others too. No one will be in any doubt on how Aries feels.

These children say it as they see it because there is no time for niceties. Time waits for no man. And, the Arian child, unless very well trained, waits for no man either. Aries will actually be quite temperamental but will seldom sulk or carry a bad moment for long. These kids will be genuinely baffled when someone takes offence with an outburst. It is the exclusive right of the Arian character to throw a huff without explanation, but there is little understanding as to why anyone else should react or take things personally. Careful nurturing into tact, diplomacy, sharing and caring -is needed, but “nurture” is the keyword. If force is used, you will be met with rebellion. This fiery youngster will learn better by example, so try to stifle the instinct to yell back. Simply suggest some “time out”. Not too long, though, because remember, this child forgets quickly. Just give it long enough for the rampant Aries to reflect and for you to gather your wits.

These kids need to be taught to listen and respect other people, and they do want to learn. So, start early by encouraging Aries to take responsibility for disruptive behavior. Encourage this child to look at the cause and effect and accept where they went wrong. Maybe quietly suggest an alternative for future reference. Aries will eventually learn to be more considerate and become easier to live with. No one will be more honest than this child will - they haven’t got time to stop and think about lies or deception. They speak from the cuff and give it to you straight. Also watch for a natural sense of fun.

These kids will love to share a joke or a prank with you and will probably laugh at your jokes even when the meaning is way beyond the baby thinking patterns. This is their way of joining in. Competitive sport is a great way of using up some of this remarkable stamina. It will make the best use of the determination and also the sheer energy that Aries will have. It will also encourage team spirit and discipline. Bear in mind that having several planets in the signs, Pisces or Taurus, before and after Aries can add a lot of patience to your young Aries character.

Astrologer Renee Francis has been using the stars to help find missing children for the last seventeen years. When you visit her website astrology-for-today.com Astrologer Renee Francis shares a variety of astrological tidbits for her readers from lucky numbers to sun sign compatibility.

Difficulty With Learning Guitar

Monday, October 30th, 2006

I’ve always wanted to be a guitar player and I remember seeing a guitar in a shop window and falling in love with the thing at first sight, I went into the store the following morning and put down a small deposit, then paid down a little on it each week from the money I got from my paper round until I was able to take it out the store before Christmas, I got home and took it out of the case, I was fourteen at the time and didn’t know one chord but I started strumming it for awhile and within minutes my fingers were extremely sore, for some weird reason I remember being teased coming home with the instrument by some school friends, I decided that no matter how long it took I would prove to them I would be able to play it.

I went into the music store in town and got myself a guitar tuition book, I made sure it was one of the easiest books I could get hold of with clear drawings of the chord and hand positions but even sitting down to try out some of the chords was like touture and painful, I began to feel that I was the only person on earth who owned a guitar and couldn’t play it because everyone I knew that owned one had no problem playing it, as far as I was concerned anyone who could play three chords or more was a genius.

I really wanted to play the guitar, there were times when I felt like giving up, I just couldn’t see any improvement, I would have given anything to get to a standard good enough to play with a band let alone do a gig, I realised that I would have to practice hard no matter how painful it would be and master holding chords from A to G then sharps and flats, there were even the tricky and fiddly major and minor keys as well that I always dreaded coming across but I went over them night after night until the pain slowly tolerable and my fingers became stronger, I listened to a lot of records and practiced various riffs from them, whenever I heard a chord I wasn’t sure I picked it out and practiced it until I was familiar with defining chords by ear.

I started to listen to many different forms of musical styles and discovered various scales and patterns that widened my creativity in playing music, as I turned sixteen I gained enough confidence to play with bands, getting used to chord changes and practice lead guitar, the process for me wasn’t easy, it involved shifting from rhythm playing to soloing and adjusting tone and volume levels within split seconds as well as keeping good timing throughout the whole ordeal.
By the time I was seventeen I became professional, which involved recording, session work, performing live and touring, from my experience it was a dream I’ve always wanted to fulfill and with practice and patience it becomes easier every time I play the instrument and the fun thing is that every time you practice you will often hear new ideas.

Professional guitarist, songwriter and musical director residing in Kent, United Kingdom, currently writes for magazines and ezines between tours and music workshops, music styles include jazz, soul, rock, blues, funk, latin and pop.

Choose the Right Lens for Portraits

Monday, October 30th, 2006

There is nothing that beats a good portrait photograph. Especially when both the subject and the photographer are pleased with the results.

But, if you want to take good portrait photos you need to think about investing in the right sort of lens. If you want your subjects to be pleased with the results of your work, then make sure you get a lens fit for the job. And that means, one with the correct focal length.

Lenses with a focal length less than 80mm are no good. They make noses look too big because the photographer has to get in too close. The ideal portrait lens has a focal length in the range 90mm to 135mm. These keep the natural proportions of the face as you see with the naked eye.

Don’t forget your sensor size when determining the equivalent focal length. Most modern digital cameras have a sensor that is smaller than the 35mm film equivalent. This means you have to factor in a multiplier to get the correct lens focal length. A film lens of 50mm would work out 80mm on a digital sensor with a 1.6 multiplier factor. Refer to your camera handbook for information on magnification factors for sensors.

A longer focal length means you can stand a bit further away and still fill the frame to your desire. This makes the nose more in proportion with the rest of the face and is very flattering.

Eric Hartwell runs the photography resource site theshutter.co.uk theshutter.co.uk and the associated discussion forums as well as the regular weblog at thephotographysite.blogspot.com thephotographysite.blogspot.com

Texas Hold’em: Luck or Skill

Monday, October 30th, 2006

You be the judge, in order to do that effectively you have to play the game. Feel the energy, excellent and rush you experience with a win or in many cases a lost.

Lets analyze this for a moment, is it luck or skill when you go ‘all in′ or raise. Sitting there hoping, wishing and praying the cards will fall your way. Many will vote that this is luck, but I say that there is also a great deal of skill involved as well more on this later.

Better yet, have you played online at full tilt poker or poker stars where the odds of the games being fixed seem to be high since they are online sites. Have you ever wondered just how legitimate playing at these sites really is is the scale fixed more in the Web master’s favor I’m sure this is a major concern of the many who play online.

Now that is something to make you go, hmm!

Its hard to really be able to play good texas hold ‘em poker online, here’s my feeling on this. It does not take much to realize that you can′t see your opponents face to face to get some good ‘tells’ that would surely help you if only you could see them. No sunglasses, the way someone might be yelling at the monitor or how nervous they are just before the flop.

It’s easier to keep your poker face on, playing online. On the other hand playing live games can be something all together different. It comes down to many factors as to how much is skill or luck as many feel texas hold’em is all about this is true for poker in general. One thing for sure anything can happen, that’s just poker.

Back to my earlier view of just how much of this game is luck, the next time you watch the WPT or WSOP on television take a note of who has made the final table and why do you see so many of the same faces there all the time.

Looking at it from this point of view I would say it is more than just luck, I am talking about hours, days, and the stress of playing nothing but poker for long periods of time. Sure they have breaks but you have to be on top of your game in order to compete at this level, there is no question about that. In my opinion this is where the skill level of the game comes into play.

There is no way this article could cover all of the points that could be made as to if this game is luck or skill. We all end up with our own opinions in the end, I’m sure many who are playing texas hold ‘em these days would say its even more than that. It may be, one will only know after playing many hours as to what it takes to win at this ever-growing trend.

Michelle Cobbs is a texas hold’em player, and enthusiast. You can learn more at home-making-money.com/holdem.html home-making-money.com/holdem.html

Light is Your Crayon - And There’s Always Another Color in the Box

Monday, October 30th, 2006

In 30 years of photographic experience, I’ve made several great friends who
work in Photo Labs. When asked about what they think is the biggest mistake
that they see every day the response is always the same. They will often
answer me after a long sigh. “These people just don’t understand light,”
they say to me.

Remember: all cameras average the existing light. What that means is, just because
you can see it . . . doesn’t mean the camera can. The human eye is far more
sophisticated than the most expensive camera money can buy. If . . . for example,
you stand someone in front of a bright window, your eye can still tell who that person
is . . . but the camera can not, at least, not without help. Your eye will zoom into a
person’s face and ignore that bright light around them, but the camera will not.
The camera’s whole purpose in life is to make an image that is 18% gray. Long ago,
someone decided that 18% gray was as close to the human eye, as a camera can get.
But if for example, 80% of the picture frame is filled with light that is brighter than
18% gray, what does the camera do? It tries to average out the given light. It will
take your best friend and makes him or her, a silhouette. Don’t get mad at the
camera, it’s only doing what it’s been told to do.

Use a flash indoors 90% of the time. The only reason, I don’t say 100% is because
some events won’t allow a flash indoors. If that’s the case, get a higher speed film
(400 or 800 ISO) and use a tripod. If you can’t give a subject more light, give it light
for a longer period of time. If you use a flash the camera speed is usually about
1/125th of a sec. or faster. But if you’re not allowed to use a flash for example,
you may shoot available light at 1/30th of a sec. or slower. (That’s why I suggest
the tripod.)

Personally, I like using a flash. I probably use a flash, even outdoors, about 80%
of the time (when I happen to be shooting people, that is). Why? Just because there’s
plenty of light, doesn’t mean that it’s the right kind of light. Bright light (like at high
noon) causes harsh shadows. I can give a short burst of flash (commonly called:
“Fill Flash”), and suddenly my colors are more vibrant and the shadows are less harsh.

Remember, if you want a subject to actually be white (a wedding dress for example)
you will have to give the shot more light than the camera suggest. If you want it to
actually be black, (a black horse for example) you will have to give the shot less light
than what the camera is indicating. If you shoot indoors, use a flash when you’re
allowed to do so. If you shoot outdoors, try using a flash, it might surprise you.

You have to make the decisions about how to expose your photos, not the camera.
The camera is only a guide, but it has no artistic taste. It will only do what it knows
how to do, which means it will give you an average exposure. If you want your shots
to look extraordinary, don’t rely on just an average reading. There are 26 letters in
the alphabet, but not every combination makes a great novel. What you do with those
26 letters determines if you are a great writer. What you do with the information your
camera gives you, determines whether or not you are a great photographer.

This Article Written By: Tedric A. Garrison

Cedar City, Utah

Tedric Garrison has done photography for over 30 years. In college he was an Art Major,
and firmly believes that “Creativity can be taught.” Today; as a writer and photographer
he shares his wealth of knowledge with the world, at:

betterphototips.com betterphototips.com

Stockbridge Romance [Chapter Three: The Bed]

Sunday, October 29th, 2006

Behind my pillar where I was sitting, the woman from the wall was now standing lit another cigarette, it was hot and bright I thought. It sent a pale glary glow, an ash like pathway to the ceiling, streaming in front of my face, half-intended I thought. I had stopped smoking in 1984, smoked for 22-years, so what could I say, I had some years on her to catch up to me before I could scold her. There was a lull, then a scramble for words with her, “Care, would you care to dance…sir?” she said.

In the last of the lull, on my part, I carried a silence, looking at my coke; her voice threw me off, an audible sincere tone. But she had been so cold to me this morning.

Even here, I thought as she stood behind me, she was trying to crush me with her casual idle, good and youthful looks and toned body. “Well,” she said.

“No, I don’t want to dance with you, so don’t bother me anymore!”

It was now 9:30 PM, and the first singer came up to sing, and started to sing, and this lady remained behind me. She had a gray glimmer to her eyes; they looked cold, dejection, and lack of sleep.

“Why,” she asked, “why will you not dance with me. I mean, you seem annoyed with me, as if I did something to you.”

I turned up the uncorked anger in my mind, said in a narrow but benevolent jinn way: “You insulted me on the wall today.”

“I did?” she commented, “How did I do that?”

“You said I was too slow, and you zoomed by me like you were some hot shot.” She held back a laugh, “See,” I said, “You’re laughing at me again!”

“But you were slow, and I was kind of teasing you I know, but it was meant as a maneuver to get to know you later, I thought you were handsome.”

“Oh…(I hesitated) but I had a bypass just a few months ago, a heart attack, I can’t climb or do all those things I used to do I suppose.”

“Oh…ooo, pardon me, I’m so sorry.” Then I thought: it would be pleasant to dance with her, to perhaps watch the night stars with someone beside myself, a good reason to start with a dance and see where it led, if a warm fire got going—good, if a quite one so be it. With politeness I said, “I’d like that dance very much.” She smiled a warm smile, loosening the atmosphere around us, then added, “It would be pleasant.” And we danced, matter-of-fact, we danced several dances, and then we went up to the karaoke machine and started singing, “Are you Lonesome Tonight,” an old Elvis song, and many of the folks like it in the bar area. And I went on to sing with her some more, her being my back up, “Love Me Tender.” As we continued to go to a third and forth song, I noticed she twisted about trying to see the words to the song, as they were big enough, and easily readable, it disengaged me from the songs for amount, “Anything wrong?” I asked. We had scarcely got over our first unpleasant moment, when she hit me with, “I’m ninety percent blind, I only have side vision (peripheral vision).”

Now I was feeling a little shame, as if I had no blood in my face. I think this was not self-satisfying for her, but it had to come out, and this was a good place for it.

“Well how did you know what I looked like on the wall?” I asked.

“I turned my head to the right, and caught your face from the narrow part of the side of my eye, and you looked good.”

She flattered me, and it felt good, I had been divorced, and she had also, we both confirmed that sitting up at the karaoke machine trying to figure out what song to sing next, when someone said, “You going to sing, if not I will!” With local etiquette we both stepped down from the platform and went over to my table, she had picked up her sweater on the way.

We sat down and talked until midnight about birds and the stone wall, and her being a teacher at one time before she became blind some seven years prior, and me a counselor, and the more we talked the more personal we became. Within these few moments we were lovers it seemed like. An affair had come; we had physical attraction and good spirits, jokes, and lots of listening skills to offer one another; it all seemed too perfect. But even if nothing would manifest out of this love affair to be, this intelligent circumstances, we would have company while in Beijing, and that would be worth it, so I thought, when she said: “Would you like to come to my room?”

See Dennis’ web site: dennissiluk.tripod.com dennissiluk.tripod.com

Betting Exchanges: 5 Reasons Why They Are The Smart Gambler’s Choice

Sunday, October 29th, 2006

At first it’s easy to feel intimidated by betting exchanges, but when it comes to getting the most bang for your buck the serious online gambler accepts no substitute. Here are a few reasons why:

1.Unbeatable value

A betting exchange places one gambler directly against another, eliminating the bookmaker and the mark-ups they place bet after bet. Remove the other overheads of traditional offline outlets as well (staff costs/maintenance), and you often end up with prices of up to 20% lower than at the bookmaker. This benefit alone makes signing up with an exchange a no-brainer.

2. Bet as the action unfolds.

Betting “in-play″allows you to respond in real time to changing events- whether it be a change in the weather, an injury to a star player or a sending off. Or maybe you’re unsure which team will be selected, what the game plan will be, or the condition of the pitch? No problem, just grab a beer and wait for the game to start. Later you can assess the factors that will effect your decisions and then make your bet.

3. Winning doesn’t get you banned.

It doesn’t matter how many big wins you have at a betting exchange you’ll never find your stakes limited or, worse, your account shut down. You’re betting against other gamblers, so the exchange has no vested interest in either your wins or your losses.

4. As well as as “backing″ a selection to win, in a betting exchange you can also “lay” a selection to lose. Ever been sure that Tiger Woods wasn’t up to winning a certain tournament? By “laying″ him at a betting exchange you can basically back the rest of the field to beat him! In such cases you are, in effect, able to take up the role of a bookmaker yourself.

5. Trading bets

The ability to “trade″ is one of the most attractive characteristics of a betting exchange. In the right circumstances “backing” a selection as well as “laying” one can result in a position where you profit whatever the outcome. This is not a simple art to perfect, however, and the best approach for anyone new to trading is to play out some situations out on paper first, before pulling out your credit card.

If you’re looking for flexibility in your gambling and value in your stakes, betting exchanges are undoubtedly the way forward. And if it still all looks a little intimidating, try getting started with a practice account. Many betting exchanges will allow you to make a series of dummy bets before taking the plunge in the live market.

Matt Davies is an online marketer and article writer. betfair.com Betfair
betfairpromo.com/promocion Apuestas